Sexual use of emoji is banned from Facebook, Instagram

Facebook Logo App

Recently, Facebook decided to take a formal stance against online sexual solicitation. To crack down on the issue, the social media giant has updated its Community Standards, effectively banning the use of certain emoji on Facebook and Instagram.

To be precise, Facebook has banned the use of both the eggplant and the peach emoji when used alongside various sorts of sexual content. The updated Facebook Community Standards do not target the emoji by name but instead refers to “[commonly used] sexual emoji” as the subject in question.

According to adult industry news site XBIZ (NSFW), a user’s account can be flagged or removed if any of its content falls under the vague criteria Facebook lays out in its Community Standards. Instagram clarified this process to The New York Post. The content “will only be removed from Facebook and Instagram if it contains a sexual emoji alongside an implicit or indirect ask for nude imagery, sex or sexual partners, or sex chat conversations,” said Instagram.

Facebook claims it isn’t merely taking action against the emoji, either. This new initiative is targeting nudity and sexual conversation of all sorts.

The only definitive exception to the new policy is when content draws attention to sexual violence and exploitation. That means even some of the internet’s favorite memes and gifs could get users flagged or even banned.

There is good news though. Posting these emoji regarding your Sunday farmer’s market haul won’t get you in trouble. The bad news is that according to the Community Standards, “long shots of fully nude butts” certainly will.

Read next: If you trust Facebook to deliver your news, the News tab is in public testing



from Android Authority https://ift.tt/2PEeA1B
via IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Removable batteries discussion

I have always preferred phones with removable batteries so far, thinking that it will most certainly be the first component in a device to fail. I have even advised people in my circles to do so, until a recent event. A family member of mine still uses a HTC DesireX. Recently, he wanted to replace his battery because of swelling. He bought two matching batteries from different sellers. The problem is, even though they were unopened/sealed packages of original batteries, they were not holding much charge. (I suppose they waited on a shelf for some time.) This made me question myself. In the past, I have used nokia smartphones, and they were easy to replace with fresh batteries, since almost all nokias used the same battery type. Now with android, its all over the place. Is it even worth it to go for a removable battery device when you cant find a replacement a couple of years after you purchase it? What do you think/prefer? PS. I realize this is not exactly fault of android OS, but
Read more