Samsung Galaxy M40 is confirmed with 32MP primary rear camera

Samsung is betting big on its India-exclusive M line, which focuses on the Millennial audience. So far, we’ve seen the Samsung Galaxy M10, M20, and M30, and now we have official confirmation of the Samsung Galaxy M40 (via 91Mobiles).

The confirmation of the Galaxy M40 comes from Asim Warsi, the senior vice president of smartphone business at Samsung India. The Samsung exec says that the Galaxy M40 will land in India on June 11 at 6:00 PM local time. Additionally, he mentioned some specifics about the M40’s camera system.

According to Warsi, the Samsung Galaxy M40 will come with a 32MP primary rear camera, likely paired with a secondary lens as we saw on the Galaxy M30. He also said there will be a front-facing sensor with a 16MP resolution.

Editor's Pick

Samsung Galaxy M series: Much ado about little something

In the lead-up to the Galaxy M launch in India, social media was awash with mentions of Samsung's new phone. Such a hype for budget and mid-range smartphones is rarely seen, especially for the Korean company. Of course, …

Finally, he confirmed that the launch price for the M40 will be “around 20,000 rupees,” or about $287. That’s a bit of a step up from the Galaxy M30, which starts at 14,990 rupees (~$215).

The camera upgrades will likely be a welcome treat for interested buyers, as our review of the M30 found the camera system to be one of the weaker points of the device.

As for other details surrounding the Samsung Galaxy M40, we only have rumors and speculation to go on. Rumors suggest the device will land with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 processor, 6GB of RAM, 128GB of internal storage, and Android 9 Pie out of the box.

What do you think? Are you excited for the Samsung Galaxy M40? Let us know in the comments.

NEXT: Samsung Galaxy M series vs. the competition



from Android Authority http://bit.ly/2W5iY9j
via IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Removable batteries discussion

I have always preferred phones with removable batteries so far, thinking that it will most certainly be the first component in a device to fail. I have even advised people in my circles to do so, until a recent event. A family member of mine still uses a HTC DesireX. Recently, he wanted to replace his battery because of swelling. He bought two matching batteries from different sellers. The problem is, even though they were unopened/sealed packages of original batteries, they were not holding much charge. (I suppose they waited on a shelf for some time.) This made me question myself. In the past, I have used nokia smartphones, and they were easy to replace with fresh batteries, since almost all nokias used the same battery type. Now with android, its all over the place. Is it even worth it to go for a removable battery device when you cant find a replacement a couple of years after you purchase it? What do you think/prefer? PS. I realize this is not exactly fault of android OS, but
Read more