What do you think should all $100 dollars/entry level phones have 5 years from now?

And compare it to Redmi 5A. It has to be at least on par with Redmi 5A and not clearly worse.

Oh and it has to have flaws too considering the budget.

It should be possible to purchase a more expensive phone (up to $200) that's even more value for money than the theoretical entry level phone.

Personally, I know this is a meme at this point but SD 625 on entry level phones would be amazing. The SD 450 works too I guess since it's basically the same thing. I really hope the chip trickles down to entry level phones and won't stay stagnant to the $200-300 range. Same goes for SD 425. SD 425 should really be retired 5 years from now.

USB C is a must too obviously.



Submitted April 29, 2018 at 07:34AM by Zangetszu https://ift.tt/2HCnNVD https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Removable batteries discussion

I have always preferred phones with removable batteries so far, thinking that it will most certainly be the first component in a device to fail. I have even advised people in my circles to do so, until a recent event. A family member of mine still uses a HTC DesireX. Recently, he wanted to replace his battery because of swelling. He bought two matching batteries from different sellers. The problem is, even though they were unopened/sealed packages of original batteries, they were not holding much charge. (I suppose they waited on a shelf for some time.) This made me question myself. In the past, I have used nokia smartphones, and they were easy to replace with fresh batteries, since almost all nokias used the same battery type. Now with android, its all over the place. Is it even worth it to go for a removable battery device when you cant find a replacement a couple of years after you purchase it? What do you think/prefer? PS. I realize this is not exactly fault of android OS, but ...
Read more